4.5 Article

Association between homocysteine and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study

期刊

NUTRITION JOURNAL
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12937-016-0221-6

关键词

Homocysteine; Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Gender; Body mass index; Interaction

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Projects for Major New Drugs Innovation and Development [2012ZX09303014001]
  2. Planned Science and Technology Project of Hunan Province, China
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [2016zzts153]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease worldwide, and its prevalence is likely to rise even further. To help understand the pathogenesis and early prevention of progressive NAFLD, this large-scale study was designed to explore the potential association between homocysteine and the prevalence of NAFLD. Methods: A total of 7203 subjects aged 18 years or older were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The association of homocysteine with the prevalence of NAFLD, in the total sample and stratified by subgroups, was examined using multiple logistic regression analyses. Results: Subjects in the higher quartiles of homocysteine had a higher prevalence of NAFLD. After multivariate adjustment, the odds ratio (OR) for NAFLD in the highest compared with the lowest quartile of homocysteine was 2.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61, 2.67). Moreover, in the subgroup analyses, we found an effect modification by gender, body mass index (BMI) and smoking status on the association between homocysteine and the prevalence of NAFLD (P for interaction: 0.001, 0.002 and <0.001, respectively). A stronger association was observed in female, obese and non-smoking adults than in male, normal weight and smoking subjects. Conclusion: Homocysteine was significantly associated with the prevalence of NAFLD, particularly in female, obese or non-smoking adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据