4.8 Article

Quantitative profiling of selective Sox/POU pairing on hundreds of sequences in parallel by Coop-seq

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 832-845

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1198

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [HG000249, GM101602]
  2. MOST China-EU Science and Technology Cooperation Program [2013DFE33080]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31471238]
  4. 100 talent award of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. Science and Technology Planning Projects of Guangdong Province, China [2014B030301058, 2016A050503038]
  6. Chinese Government Scholarship (CGS)
  7. University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS)
  8. NIH [HG000249]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cooperative binding of transcription factors is known to be important in the regulation of gene expression programs conferring cellular identities. However, current methods to measure cooperativity parameters have been laborious and therefore limited to studying only a few sequence variants at a time. We developed Coop-seq (cooperativity by sequencing) that is capable of efficiently and accurately determining the cooperativity parameters for hundreds of different DNA sequences in a single experiment. We apply Coop-seq to 12 dimer pairs from the Sox and POU families of transcription factors using 324 unique sequences with changed half-site orientation, altered spacing and discrete randomization within the binding elements. The study reveals specific dimerization profiles of different Sox factors with Oct4. By contrast, Oct4 and the three neural class III POU factors Brn2, Brn4 and Oct6 assemble with Sox2 in a surprisingly indistinguishable manner. Two novel half-site configurations can support functional Sox/Oct dimerization in addition to known composite motifs. Moreover, Coop-seq uncovers a nucleotide switch within the POU half-site when spacing is altered, which is mirrored in genomic loci bound by Sox2/Oct4 complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据