4.8 Article

PceRBase: a database of plant competing endogenous RNA

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 D1, 页码 D1009-D1014

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw916

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371328, 31571366, 31450110068]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0501704]
  3. Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2015C32057]
  4. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production
  5. Nanjing Agricultural University
  6. National Research foundation of South Africa [CS08-L05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Competition for microRNA (miRNA) binding between RNA molecules has emerged as a novel mechanism for the regulation of eukaryotic gene expression. Competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) can act as decoys for miRNA binding, thereby forming a ceRNA network by regulating the abundance of other RNA transcripts which share the same or similar microRNA response elements. Although this type of RNA cross talk was first described in Arabidop-sis, and was subsequently shown to be active in animal models, there is no database collecting potential ceRNA data for plants. We have developed a Plant ceRNA database (PceRBase, http://bis. zju. edu. cn/pcernadb/index. jsp) which contains potential ceRNA target-target, and ceRNA target-mimic pairs from 26 plant species. For example, in Arabidopsis lyrata, 311 candidate ceRNAs are identified which could affect 2646 target-miRNA-target interactions. Predicted pairing structure between miRNAs and their target mRNA transcripts, expression levels of ceRNA pairs and associated GO annotations are also stored in the database. A web interface provides convenient browsing and searching for specific genes of interest. Tools are available for the visualization and enrichment analysis of genes in the ceRNA networks. Moreover, users can use PceRBase to predict novel competing mimic-target and target-target interactions from their own data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据