4.8 Article

Identifying gene regulatory network rewiring using latent differential graphical models

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw581

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HG007352, CA182360, DK107965]
  2. National Science Foundation [1054309, 1262575]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1619983] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  6. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1619878] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) are highly dynamic among different tissue types. Identifying tissue-specific gene regulation is critically important to understand gene function in a particular cellular context. Graphical models have been used to estimate GRN from gene expression data to distinguish direct interactions from indirect associations. However, most existing methods estimate GRN for a specific cell/tissue type or in a tissue-naive way, or do not specifically focus on network rewiring between different tissues. Here, we describe a new method called Latent Differential Graphical Model (LDGM). The motivation of our method is to estimate the differential network between two tissue types directly without inferring the network for individual tissues, which has the advantage of utilizing much smaller sample size to achieve reliable differential network estimation. Our simulation results demonstrated that LDGM consistently outperforms other Gaussian graphical model based methods. We further evaluated LDGM by applying to the brain and blood gene expression data from the GTEx consortium. We also applied LDGM to identify network rewiring between cancer subtypes using the TCGA breast cancer samples. Our results suggest that LDGM is an effective method to infer differential network using high-throughput gene expression data to identify GRN dynamics among different cellular conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据