4.8 Article

Atomic structure of an archaeal GAN suggests its dual roles as an exonuclease in DNA repair and a CMG component in DNA replication

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 19, 页码 9505-9517

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw789

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [60423133, 26242075]
  2. JSPS
  3. Institute for Fermentation, Osaka (IFO)
  4. AMED Platform for Drug Discovery, Informatics, and Structural Life Science [16am0101042j0005]
  5. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology [26242075]
  6. [201602633]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26242075, 16J02633, 26440023] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In eukaryotic DNA replication initiation, hexameric MCM (mini-chromosome maintenance) unwinds the template double-stranded DNA to form the replication fork. MCM is activated by two proteins, Cdc45 and GINS, which constitute the 'CMG' unwindosome complex together with the MCM core. The archaeal DNA replication system is quite similar to that of eukaryotes, but only limited knowledge about the DNA unwinding mechanism is available, from a structural point of view. Here, we describe the crystal structure of an archaeal GAN (GINS-associated nuclease) from Thermococcus kodakaraensis, the homolog of eukaryotic Cdc45, in both the free form and the complex with the C-terminal domain of the cognate Gins51 subunit (Gins51C). This first archaeal GAN structure exhibits a unique, 'hybrid' structure between the bacterial RecJ and the eukaryotic Cdc45. GAN possesses the conserved DHH and DHH1 domains responsible for the exonuclease activity, and an inserted CID (CMG interacting domain)-like domain structurally comparable to that in Cdc45, suggesting its dual roles as an exonuclease in DNA repair and a CMG component in DNA replication. A structural comparison of the GAN-Gins51C complex with the GINS tetramer suggests that GINS uses the mobile Gins51C as a hook to bind GAN for CMG formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据