4.8 Article

Evaluating the impact of single nucleotide variants on transcription factor binding

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 21, 页码 10106-10116

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw691

关键词

-

资金

  1. Genome Canada/Genome BC [174DE]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN355532-10]
  3. National Institutes of Health (USA) [1R01GM084875]
  4. PhD fellowship from China Scholar Council [201206110038]
  5. Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver
  6. British Columbia Children's Hospital Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diseases and phenotypes caused by disrupted transcription factor (TF) binding are being identified, but progress is hampered by our limited capacity to predict such functional alterations. Improving predictions may be dependent on expanding the set of bona fide TF binding alterations. Allele-specific binding (ASB) events, where TFs preferentially bind to one of the two alleles at heterozygous sites, reveal the impact of sequence variations in altered TF binding. Here, we present the largest ASB compilation to our knowledge, 10 765 ASB events retrieved from 45 ENCODE ChIP-Seq data sets. Our analysis showed that ASB events were frequently associated with motif alterations of the ChIP'ed TF and potential partner TFs, allelic difference of DNase I hypersensitivity and allelic difference of histone modifications. For TF dimers bound symmetrically to DNA, ASB data revealed that central positions of the TF binding motifs were disproportionately important for binding. Lastly, the impact of variation on TF binding was predicted by a classification model incorporating all the investigated features of ASB events. Classification models using only DNase I hypersensitivity and sequence data exhibited predictive accuracy approaching the models with substantially more features. Taken together, the combination of ASB data and the classification model represents an important step toward elucidating regulatory variants across the human genome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据