4.1 Review

A systematic review of single-sample glomerular filtration rate measurement techniques and demonstration of equal accuracy to slope-intercept methods

期刊

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 37, 期 7, 页码 743-755

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000448

关键词

glomerular filtration rate; isotope glomerular filtration rate; single sample; slope-intercept

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PurposeWe aimed to identify the most accurate single-sample glomerular filtration rate (SS-GFR) technique for all patient ages.Materials and methodsWe performed a systematic review of all published SS-GFR measurement techniques and compared the results from each test with a gold-standard nine-point area-under-curve' measurement of GFR as well as slope-intercept (SI-GFR) methods for 412 GFR tests.ResultsWe have shown that for patients of all ages the SS-GFR technique developed by Fleming and colleagues delivers the best accuracy and precision, with results equivalent to those calculated by SI-GFR. The median percentage difference from the gold-standard GFR for the Fleming technique is 4.8% (95% confidence interval 3.9-5.7%) and that for the three-point SI-GFR is 5.6% (95% confidence interval 4.9-6.3%). The interquartile range of the distribution of percentage difference from the gold standard is -0.23 to 11% for the Fleming method and 1.6-11% for the three-point SI-GFR.ConclusionThe Fleming technique outperforms the method currently recommended by the international guidelines, and is simpler as only one equation is required for all patients instead of separate equations for adults and children. We propose that the SS-GFR technique of Fleming replace the methods currently recommended by the international and BNMS guidelines for routine measurement of GFR for expected results greater than 30ml/min/1.73m(2). A thorough system of measurement checks should be implemented for all methods of GFR assessment; the perceived lack of opportunity for quality control checks to be performed on the result of a single-sample measurement is addressed in the companion paper of this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据