4.1 Article

Assessment of Ascorbic Acid, Polyphenols, Flavonoids, Anthocyanins and Carotenoids Content in Tomato Fruits

期刊

出版社

UNIV AGR SCI & VETERINARY MED CLUJ-NAPOCA
DOI: 10.15835/nbha44210332

关键词

anthocyanins; beta-carotene; flavonoids; lycopene; organic farming; tomatoes; vitamin C

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increased interest in organic tomatoes production demands breeders to develop new cultivars, which besides suitability in low-input production system and marketable quality, have to exhibit high nutritional value, including health-promoting compounds. In this respect, this paper aimed to assess and compare the nutritional value of four Romanian tomato cultivars, two with determinate growth ('Arges 11' and 'Arges 123') and two with indeterminate growth ('Costate 21' and ;Stefanesti 22'), created and recommended for organic production in open field and protected cultivation. The tomato cultivars were laid out in a high plastic tunnel crop and the tomato fruits were evaluated as chemical composition, being determined the following parameters: moisture, ash, soluble solids, pH, acidity and content in some antioxidant compounds, such as vitamin C, polyphenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins, lycopene and beta-carotene. Considering some chemical parameters important in revealing tomato flavor, such as soluble solids, pH and acidity, 'Stefanesti 22' cultivar showed the best ratio among them. The differences in antioxidant composition among cultivars were not statistically significant (P>0.05) for most of the analyzed parameters, with the exception of lycopene content which showed significant variation. Thus, `Costate 21' showed the highest amount of lycopene within indeterminate cultivars (17.49 mg 100 g(-1) FW), while 'Arges 11' showed the highest amount of lycopene within determinate cultivars (13.92 mg 100 g(-1) FW). According to the nutritional value of cultivars assessed in this study, `Costate 21' is the best recommendation for greenhouse cultivation while `Arges 11' is the best recommendation for open field cultivation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据