4.0 Article

Evaluation of a Simple Low-cost Intervention to Empower People with CKD to Reduce Their Dietary Salt Intake: OxCKD1, a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

KIDNEY360
卷 4, 期 7, 页码 890-898

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000160

关键词

CKD; chronic renal insufficiency; clinical nephrology; clinical trial; patient-centered care; randomized controlled trials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to evaluate a simple low-cost intervention to help people with CKD reduce their dietary salt intake. The results showed that after one month of the OxSalt care bundle intervention, dietary salt intake, assessed by 24-hour urine sodium excretion, decreased by 1.9 (+/- 2.9) g/d in the intervention group compared to 0.4 (+/- 2.7) g/d in the control group. Additionally, the intervention group continued to have a reduced salt intake to a lesser extent over the following year.
Background To evaluate the efficacy of a simple low-cost intervention to empower people with CKD to reduce their dietary salt intake. Methods A randomized controlled trial in primary and secondary care comparing the OxSalt care bundle intervention versus standard care for 1 month. Participants were people with CKD and an eGFR > 20 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) and were recruited from primary and secondary care. The primary outcome was a reduction in dietary salt intake, as assessed by 24-hour urinary sodium excretion, after 1 month of the intervention. Results Two hundred and one participants were recruited. Dietary salt intake, as assessed from 24-hour urine sodium excretion, fell by 1.9 (+/- 2.9) g/d in the intervention group compared with 0.4 (+/- 2.7) g/d in the control group (P < 0.001). Salt intake was still reduced to a lesser extent over the following year in the intervention group. Conclusions A short, low-cost, easily delivered intervention empowers people with CKD to reduce their dietary salt intake. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01552317.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据