4.6 Article

Structure-function analyses of the Pth11 receptor reveal an important role for CFEM motif and redox regulation in rice blast

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 214, 期 1, 页码 330-342

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14347

关键词

antioxidant; appressorium; CFEM domain; Magnaporthe oryzae; Pth11; redox regulation; rice blast; surface recognition

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (Prime Minister's Office) [NRF-CRP7-2010-02]
  2. Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory, Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction of Magnaporthe oryzae, the rice blast fungus, and rice begins when M. oryzae establishes contact with the host plant surface. On perception of appropriate surface signals, M. oryzae forms appressoria and initiates host invasion. Pth11, an important G-protein-coupled receptor necessary for appressorium formation in M. oryzae, contains seven transmembrane regions and a CFEM (common in several fungal extracellular membrane proteins) domain with the characteristic eight cysteine residues. We focused on gaining further insight into the role of the CFEM domain in the putative surface sensing/response function of Pth11. Increased/constitutive expression of CFEM resulted in precocious, albeit defective, appressoria formation in wild-type M. oryzae. The Pth11(C63A/C65A) mutant, probably with disrupted disulfide bonds in the CFEM, showed delayed appressorium formation and reduced virulence. Furthermore, the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was found to be altered in the pth11 Delta strain. Strikingly, antioxidant treatment induced appressorium formation in pth11 Delta. The G alpha subunit MagB and the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase Pmk1 were required for the formation of antioxidant-induced appressoria. We conclude that the CFEM domain of Pth11 is required for proper development of the appressoria, appressoria-like structures and pathogenicity. Highly regulated ROS homeostasis is important for Pth11-mediated appressorium formation in M. oryzae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据