4.8 Article

70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 375, 期 8, 页码 717-729

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602253

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission [FP6-LSHC-CT-2004-503426]
  2. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  3. Novartis
  4. F. Hoffmann-La Roche
  5. Sanofi-Aventis
  6. Eli Lilly
  7. Veridex
  8. U.S. National Cancer Institute
  9. European Breast Cancer Council-Breast Cancer Working Group (BCWG grant for the MINDACT biobank)
  10. Jacqueline Seroussi Memorial Foundation for Cancer Research (JSMF)
  11. Prix Mois du Cancer du Sein
  12. Susan G. Komen for the Cure [SG05-0922-02]
  13. Fondation Belge contre le Cancer [SCIE 2005-27]
  14. Dutch Cancer Society (KWF)
  15. Netherlands Genomics Initiative-Cancer Genomics Center
  16. Association le Cancer du Sein
  17. Parlons-enl
  18. Brussels Breast Cancer Walk-Run
  19. American Women's Club of Brussels
  20. NIF Trust
  21. German Cancer Aid
  22. Grant Simpson Trust
  23. Cancer Research UK
  24. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer
  25. EORTC Cancer Research Fund
  26. Cancer Research UK [7714] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The 70-gene signature test (MammaPrint) has been shown to improve prediction of clinical outcome in women with early-stage breast cancer. We sought to provide prospective evidence of the clinical utility of the addition of the 70-gene signature to standard clinical-pathological criteria in selecting patients for adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS In this randomized, phase 3 study, we enrolled 6693 women with early-stage breast cancer and determined their genomic risk (using the 70-gene signature) and their clinical risk (using a modified version of Adjuvant! Online). Women at low clinical and genomic risk did not receive chemotherapy, whereas those at high clinical and genomic risk did receive such therapy. In patients with discordant risk results, either the genomic risk or the clinical risk was used to determine the use of chemotherapy. The primary goal was to assess whether, among patients with high-risk clinical features and a low-risk gene-expression profile who did not receive chemotherapy, the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the rate of 5-year survival without distant metastasis would be 92% (i.e., the noninferiority boundary) or higher. RESULTS A total of 1550 patients (23.2%) were deemed to be at high clinical risk and low genomic risk. At 5 years, the rate of survival without distant metastasis in this group was 94.7% (95% confidence interval, 92.5 to 96.2) among those not receiving chemotherapy. The absolute difference in this survival rate between these patients and those who received chemotherapy was 1.5 percentage points, with the rate being lower without chemotherapy. Similar rates of survival without distant metastasis were reported in the subgroup of patients who had estrogen-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, and either node-negative or node-positive disease. CONCLUSIONS Among women with early-stage breast cancer who were at high clinical risk and low genomic risk for recurrence, the receipt of no chemotherapy on the basis of the 70-gene signature led to a 5-year rate of survival without distant metastasis that was 1.5 percentage points lower than the rate with chemotherapy. Given these findings, approximately 46% of women with breast cancer who are at high clinical risk might not require chemotherapy. (Funded by the European Commission Sixth Framework Program and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00433589; EudraCT number, 2005-002625-31.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据