4.2 Article

Design and evaluation of multi-core raspberry-like platinum nanoparticles for enhanced photothermal treatment

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43246-023-00411-1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Platinum nanoparticles are emerging as promising candidates for enhancing radiotherapy sensitivity, with their multi-core structure showing efficient near-infrared photothermal treatment on glioblastoma tumoroids and demonstrating good biostability.
While gold-based nanoparticles are now commonly used in nanomedicine due to their stability and high plasmonic resonance, platinum nanoparticles are recently emerging as promising candidates for enhancing radiotherapy sensitivity due to their high atomic number. Here, we demonstrate that platinum-based nanomaterials with a multi-core structure also possess efficient near-infrared photothermal properties, despite platinum's maximum absorption being primarily in the ultraviolet region. The photothermal efficacy of these platinum multi-core raspberry-like nanoparticles is compared with single-core ultra-small platinum nanoseeds, within glioblastoma cancer spheroids, showcasing the potential of platinum nanocore aggregation for photothermal therapy in cancer treatment. Additionally, we used a microfabrication technique for high-throughput growth of spheroids in microwells to evaluate photothermal treatment on glioblastoma spheroids. Finally, X-ray absorption spectroscopy was conducted to analyze the stability and behavior of both nanoparticles in the cellular environment, indicating their excellent biostability. Moreover, even after laser application, none of the nanoparticles degraded but instead underwent reshaping into a more crystalline structure. Platinum nanoparticles are promising candidates for enhancing radiotherapy sensitivity. Here, platinum-based nanomaterials with a multi-core structure show efficient near-infrared photothermal treatment on glioblastoma tumoroids with good biostability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据