4.8 Article

Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 375, 期 13, 页码 1231-1241

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602044

关键词

-

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [HD64729]
  2. Pfizer
  3. AirStrip
  4. Biogen Idec
  5. Teva Neuroscience
  6. Sanofi
  7. Receptos
  8. Gilead Sciences
  9. Neuren Pharmaceuticals
  10. Apotex/Modigenetech
  11. Opko
  12. Ono/Merck
  13. GlaxoSmithKline
  14. Horizon Pharma
  15. Reata Pharma
  16. PTC Therapeutics
  17. MedImmune
  18. EMD Serono
  19. Novartis
  20. Questcor
  21. Genentech
  22. Janssen
  23. Genzyme
  24. Transparency Life Sciences
  25. Roche
  26. Opexa
  27. Somahlution
  28. Savara
  29. Nivalis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND The addition of azithromycin to standard regimens for antibiotic prophylaxis before cesarean delivery may further reduce the rate of postoperative infection. We evaluated the benefits and safety of azithromycin-based extended-spectrum prophylaxis in women undergoing nonelective cesarean section. METHODS In this trial conducted at 14 centers in the United States, we studied 2013 women who had a singleton pregnancy with a gestation of 24 weeks or more and who were undergoing cesarean delivery during labor or after membrane rupture. We randomly assigned 1019 to receive 500 mg of intravenous azithromycin and 994 to receive placebo. All the women were also scheduled to receive standard antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was a composite of endometritis, wound infection, or other infection occurring within 6 weeks. RESULTS The primary outcome occurred in 62 women (6.1%) who received azithromycin and in 119 (12.0%) who received placebo (relative risk, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.68; P<0.001). There were significant differences between the azithromycin group and the placebo group in rates of endometritis (3.8% vs. 6.1%, P=0.02), wound infection (2.4% vs. 6.6%, P<0.001), and serious maternal adverse events (1.5% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.03). There was no significant between-group difference in a secondary neonatal composite outcome that included neonatal death and serious neonatal complications (14.3% vs. 13.6%, P = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS Among women undergoing nonelective cesarean delivery who were all receiving standard antibiotic prophylaxis, extended-spectrum prophylaxis with adjunctive azithromycin was more effective than placebo in reducing the risk of postoperative infection. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; C/SOAP ClinicalTrials. gov number, NCT01235546.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据