3.8 Article

Clinical determinants of ischemic heart disease in Eastern Europe

期刊

LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100698

关键词

Cardiovascular diseases; Geography; Eastern Europe; Determinants of health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiovascular inequalities are pervasive in European countries, with pronounced variations in disease burden and access to healthcare in Eastern Europe. Despite efforts by the European Parliament, there is a lack of large-scale studies on reducing cardiovascular disparities in this region, highlighting the need for improved data and collaborative research.
Cardiovascular inequalities remain pervasive in the European countries. Disparities in disease burden is apparent among population groups based on sex, ethnicity, economic status or geography. To address this challenge, The Lancet Regional Health -Europe convened experts from a broad range of countries to assess the current state of knowledge of cardiovascular disease inequalities across Europe. This report presents the main challenges in Eastern Europe. There were pronounced variations in cardiovascular disease mortality rates across Eastern European countries with a remarkably high disease burden in the North-Eastern Europe. There were also significant differences in access and delivery to healthcare and unmet healthcare needs. Addressing the cardiovascular determinants of health and reducing health disparities in its many dimensions has long been a priority of the European Parliament's work through reso-lutions and by financing pilot projects. Yet, despite these efforts, few large-scale studies have been conducted to examine the feasibility of reducing cardiovascular disparities in Eastern Europe. There is an urgent need for improved data, measurements, reporting, and comparisons; and for dedicated, collaborative research. There is also a need for a broader understanding of the typology of actions needed to tackle cardiovascular inequalities and a clear political will.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据