4.1 Article

Dynamic modeling, simulation and optimization of the partially-autothermal reforming of biogas in coated monolith channels

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceja.2023.100539

关键词

Coated monolith channels; Biogas reforming; Thermodynamic modeling; Dynamic simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A dynamic model of a catalyst-coated SiSiC monolithic structure is proposed for the autothermal reforming of biogas. The model includes a single channel 2-D representation and solves dimensionless mass and energy transport equations. The model is verified using literature kinetics data and can be used for experiment design and process optimization.
A dynamic model is proposed describing a catalyst-coated SiSiC monolithic structure taking as a case study the autothermal reforming of biogas (SCR=3; OCR=0.66) in an adiabatic mode of operation. A single channel 2-D representation is assumed including dimensionless mass and energy transport equations solved in gPROMS platform resembling the performance of the whole monolith by breaking down the channel topology into three computational layers, namely the channel, the porous catalytic washcoat, where catalytic reforming and oxidation reactions take place, and the supporting wall. The model is verified using literature kinetics data in comparison with thermodynamic equilibrium analysis in HSC Chemistry software, which hints an optimization scheme for the optimal washcoat thickness to maximize H2 formation. The optimal values are applied to the three-layer model in order to track the dynamic evolution of the dependent variables of temperature and compositions from start-up of the monolith to the introduction of the biogas-O2 feed at the desired temperature to the response of the system to any disturbances being imposed after steady-state is reached. The overall dynamic model can interpret various aspects of the combined combustion and reforming of biogas in catalytic monolithic structures and can be used as an assistance for experiment design and process optimization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据