4.2 Article

Total Synthesis of Altemicidin: A Surprise Ending for a Monoterpene Alkaloid

期刊

JACS AU
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00417

关键词

alkaloid; total synthesis; biosynthesis; cycloaddition; pyridine; dearomatization; heterocyclic chemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article documents the evolution of a synthetic program aimed at accessing the unusual sulfonamide-containing natural product altemicidin. The study found that the biosynthetic pathway of altemicidin is similar to the presumed abiotic synthetic strategy. The synthesis of altemicidin proved challenging due to the manipulation of multiple functional groups present on the highly polar scaffold.
Monoterpene alkaloids encompass distinct chemical diversity and wide-ranging bioactivity. Their compact complexity has made them popular as synthetic targets and has inspired many distinct strategies and tactics in the field of heterocyclic chemistry. This article documents the evolution of a synthetic program aimed at accessing the unusual sulfonamide-containing natural product altemicidin, which was generally believed to be a monoterpene alkaloid throughout our entire synthetic investigations but has recently been found to originate through an unexpected and quite disparate biosynthetic pathway. By leveraging a pyridine dearomatization/cycloaddition strategy, we developed a concise pathway to the 5,6-fused bicyclic azaindane core and, after significant experimentation, an ultimate synthesis of altemicidin itself. Tactics to productively manipulate the multiple functional groups present on this highly polar scaffold proved challenging but were eventually realized via several carefully orchestrated and chemoselective transformations-investments that paid dividends in the form of significantly shorter chemical synthesis. Surprisingly, the bond-forming logic between our presumed abiotic synthetic strategy to this alkaloid class and its subsequently identified biosynthetic pathway is eerily similar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据