3.8 Article

Differential utilisation of dissolved organic matter compound fractions by different biofilter microbial communities

期刊

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/aqua.2023.036

关键词

biofiltration; community assembly; dissolved organic matter; LC-OCD; microbial degradation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the abilities of microbial communities from different parts of a biofilter to process DOM. The bottom community showed the highest growth rate on DOM and had a higher preference for complex DOM fractions. The higher relative abundance of the Curvibacter genus in the bottom community suggests its crucial role in degrading complex DOM fractions.
Dissolved organic matter (DOM) is a complex mixture of carbon-based compounds present in natural aquatic systems, which significantly affects drinking water treatment processes. Biofiltration, utilising biologically active beds of porous medium, offers a low-energy and low-chemical solution for controlling bioavailable DOM. However, the impact of microbial community composition on DOM degradation in biofilters remains poorly understood. This study aimed to explore the abilities of microbial communities from the top, middle, and bottom (TOP, MID, and BOT) of a biofilter to process DOM. We showed varying growth rates on the DOM, with bottom community exhibiting the highest cell abundance at the end of the experiment (1.83 x 10(6) +/- 9 x 10(3); 2.06 x 10(6) +/- 1 x 10(4); 2.15 x 10(6) +/- 7 x 10(3) cells/mL for the TOP, MID, and BOT, respectively). The three communities showed different preferences for utilising specific DOM fractions, with the bottom community targeting more complex ones. The microbial communities from the bottom of the biofilter had a higher relative abundance of the Curvibacter genus, suggesting it could play a crucial role in degrading complex DOM fractions. These findings highlight the influence of microbial community composition on DOM degradation in biofilters, providing valuable insights for optimising their performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据