4.1 Article

The role of Northern Hemisphere summer insolation for millennial-scale climate variability during the penultimate glacial

期刊

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-023-00908-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines speleothem records from caves in the European Alps and finds that solar insolation, as well as sea level change, played a significant role in modulating stadial-interstadial variability during the penultimate glacial period.
Previous glacial intervals were punctuated by abrupt climate transitions between cold (stadial) and warm (interstadial) conditions. Many mechanisms leading to stadial-interstadial variability have been hypothesized with ice volume being a commonly involved element. Here, we test to which extent insolation modulated stadial-interstadial oscillations occurred during the penultimate glacial. We present a replicated and precisely dated speleothem record covering the period between 200 and 130 ka before present from caves located in the European Alps known to be sensitive to millennial-scale variability. We show that the widely proposed relationship between sea level change and stadial-interstadial variability was additionally modulated by solar insolation during this time interval. We find that interstadials occurred preferentially near maxima of Northern Hemisphere summer insolation, even when sea level remained close to its minimum during peak glacial periods. We confirm these observations with model simulations that accurately reproduce the frequency and duration of interstadials for given sea-level and insolation forcing. Our results imply that summer insolation played an important role in modulating the occurrence of stadial-interstadial oscillations and highlight the relevance of insolation in triggering abrupt climate changes. Northern hemisphere summer insolation, as well as sea level, modulated stadial-interstadial variability during the penultimate glacial, according to speleothem records from the European Alps

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据