3.8 Article

Evaluating the perioperative analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided trigeminal nerve block in adult patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery under general anesthesia: A randomized controlled study

期刊

EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 598-604

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/11101849.2023.2238529

关键词

Trigeminal nerve block; Ultrasonography; Analgesics; Maxillofacial surgery; >

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided trigeminal nerve block (USGTNB) for pain control in patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery under general anesthesia. Results showed that USGTNB significantly reduced intraoperative fentanyl consumption and hemodynamic parameters, as well as postoperative pain and nalbuphine consumption. USGTNB had a better safety profile and patient satisfaction compared to general anesthesia alone.
Background Although ultrasound-guided nerve blocks have lately been used to control pain, there is not much evidence assessing the outcome of trigeminal nerve block (TNB) in maxillofacial surgery. This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of analgesia with an ultrasound-guided trigeminal nerve block (USGTNB) in patients undergoing unilateral maxillofacial surgery under general anesthesia. Methods This single-blinded, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial included 50 adult patients who had American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II and were prepared for elective unilateral maxillofacial procedure under general anesthesia. The patients were randomized into two groups. In the intervention (TNB) group, 25 patients received USGTNB using 5 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%, while in the control group, 25 patients received only general anesthesia. Total intraoperative fentanyl consumption was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were the intraoperative hemodynamic parameters besides the postoperative pain, total opioid consumption, complications, and patient satisfaction. Results Compared to general anesthesia, USGTNB significantly reduced the intraoperative fentanyl consumption (2.38 & PLUSMN; 0.62 vs 0.36 & PLUSMN; 0.55, p < 0.001), and the intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure at 1, 2, and 3 h (p < 0.001), the numerical rating score during the 24 postoperative hours (p < 0.001), and the postoperative nalbuphine consumption (11.60 & PLUSMN; 4.72 vs 1.92 & PLUSMN; 3.28, p < 0.001). USGTNB had a better safety profile and showed better patient satisfaction compared to general anesthesia alone (8.04 & PLUSMN; 0.89 vs 5.84 & PLUSMN; 0.90, p < 0.001). Conclusion USGTNB can provide an effective, safe approach for controlling pain in adult patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据