4.1 Article

Combination of sonic wave velocity, density and electrical resistivity for joint estimation of gas-hydrate reservoir parameters and their uncertainties

期刊

ADVANCES IN GEO-ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 133-140

出版社

Yandy Scientific Press
DOI: 10.46690/ager.2023.11.07

关键词

Gas-hydrate; saturation; porosity; Bayesian inversion; uncertainty

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gas-hydrate saturation and porosity are crucial parameters for gas-hydrate resource assessment, but their estimation using single petrophysical models is inconsistent and uncertain. This study proposes a joint estimation method that combines sonic wave velocity, density, and resistivity data to simultaneously estimate gas-hydrate saturation and porosity using Bayesian linear inversion. The accuracy of the method is validated by comparing the estimation results with pore water chemistry and density logs.
Gas-hydrate saturation and porosity are the most crucial reservoir parameters for gas-hydrate resource assessment. Numerous academics have put forward elastic and electrical petrophysical models for calculating the saturation and porosity of gas-hydrate. However, owing to the limitations of a single petrophysical model, the estimation of gas-hydrate saturation and porosity using single elastic or electrical measurement data appears to be inconsistent and uncertain. In this study, the sonic wave velocity, density and resistivity well log data are combined with a Bayesian linear inversion method for the simultaneous estimation of gas-hydrate saturation and porosity. The sonic wave velocity, density and resistivity data of the Shenhu area in the South China Sea are used to estimate the gas-hydrate saturation and porosity. To validate the accuracy of this method, the estimation results are compared with the saturation obtained from pore water chemistry and porosity obtained from density logs. The well log data examples show that the joint estimation method not only provides a rapid estimation of the gas-hydrate reservoir parameters but also improves the accuracy of results and determines their uncertainty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据