3.8 Article

Factors Affecting Digital Tool Use in Client Interaction According to Mental Health Professionals: Interview Study

期刊

JMIR HUMAN FACTORS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/44681

关键词

clinical practice; digital mental health interventions; intervention design; mental health applications; mental health professionals; teletherapy; mobile phone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to understand how mental health professionals (MHPs) use different digital tools in clinical client practice and describe their usage patterns. The study found that MHPs use digital tools for communication, diagnosis and evaluation, and facilitating therapeutic change. The usage of digitized and digital tools varied among MHPs, challenging the scalability benefits of digital tools.
Background: Digital tools and interventions are being increasingly developed in response to the growing mental health crisis, and mental health professionals (MHPs) considerably influence their adoption in client practice. However, how MHPs use digital tools in client interaction is yet to be sufficiently understood, which poses challenges to their design, development, and implementation.Objective: This study aimed to create a contextual understanding of how MHPs use different digital tools in clinical client practice and what characterizes the use across tools.Methods: A total of 19 Finnish MHPs participated in semistructured interviews, and the data were transcribed, coded, and inductively analyzed.Results: We found that MHP digital tool use was characterized by 3 distinct functions: communication, diagnosis and evaluation, and facilitating therapeutic change. The functions were addressed using analog tools, digitized tools that mimic their analog counterparts, and digital tools that use the possibilities native to digital. The MHP-client communication included various media alongside face-to-face meetings, the MHPs increasingly used digitized tools in client evaluation, and the MHPs actively used digitized materials to facilitate therapeutic change. MHP tool use was generally characterized by adaptability-it was negotiated in client interactions. However, there was considerable variance in the breadth of MHPs' digital toolbox. The existing clinical practices emphasized MHP-client interaction and invited incremental rather than radical developments, which challenged the achievement of the scalability benefits expected from digital tools.Conclusions: MHPs use digitized and digital tools in client practice. Our results contribute to the user-centered research, development, and implementation of new digital solutions in mental health care by classifying them according to their function and medium and describing how MHPs use and do not use them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据