4.4 Article

Traumatic brain injury accelerates amyloid-β deposition and impairs spatial learning in the triple-transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 629, 期 -, 页码 62-67

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.06.066

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid-beta protein; Cognitive impairment; Traumatic brain injury; Triple-transgenic AD-model mouse

资金

  1. Tokushima Bunri University for Educational Reform and Collaborative Research [TBU2012-2-2]
  2. [24590133]
  3. [15K07910]
  4. [26462161]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several pathological and epidemiological studies have demonstrated a possible relationship between traumatic brain injury (TBI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the exact contribution of TBI to AD onset and progression is unclear. Hence, we examined AD-related histopathological changes and cognitive impairment after TBI in triple transgenic (3 xTg)-AD model mice. Five- to seven-month-old 3 xTg-AD model mice were subjected to either TBI by the weight-drop method or a sham treatment. In the 3 xTg-AD mice subjected to TBI, the spatial learning was not significantly different 7 days after TBI compared to that of the sham-treated 3xTg-AD mice. However, 28 days after TBI, the 3 xTg-AD mice exhibited significantly lower spatial learning than the sham-treated 3xTg-AD mice. Correspondingly, while a few amyloid-beta (A beta) plaques were observed in both sham-treated and TBI-treated 3 xTg-AD mouse hippocampus 7 days after TBI, the A beta deposition was significantly greater in 3 xTg-AD mice 28 days after TBI. Thus, we demonstrated that TBI induced a significant increase in hippocampal A beta deposition 28 days after TBI compared to that of the control animals, which was associated with worse spatial learning ability in 3 xTg-AD mice. The present study suggests that TBI could be a risk factor for accelerated AD progression, particularly when genetic and hereditary predispositions are involved. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据