4.7 Review

The fate of memory: Reconsolidation and the case of Prediction Error

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 423-441

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.004

关键词

Conditioning models; Dopamine; Expectation; Hippocampus; Prediction Error; Memory labilization; Memory reactivation; Memory reconsolidation; Memory strengthening; Memory updating; Reminder; Surprise

资金

  1. FONCYT [PICT2010-0391, PICT 2012-0117, PICT 2013-0412]
  2. grant UBACyT [20020130100881BA]
  3. ANPCyT PICT [2013-0375]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to make predictions based on stored information is a general coding strategy. A Prediction Error (PE) is a mismatch between expected and current events. It was proposed as the process by which memories are acquired. But, our memories like ourselves are subject to change. Thus, an acquired memory can become active and update its content or strength by a labilization-reconsolidation process. Within the reconsolidation framework, PE drives the updating of consolidated memories. Moreover, memory features, such as strength and age, are crucial boundary conditions that limit the initiation of the reconsolidation process. In order to disentangle these boundary conditions, we review the role of surprise, classical models of conditioning, and their neural correlates. Several forms of PE were found to be capable of inducing memory labilization-reconsolidation. Notably, many of the PE findings mirror those of memory-reconsolidation, suggesting a strong link between these signals and memory process. Altogether, the aim of the present work is to integrate a psychological and neuroscientific analysis of PE into a general framework for memory-reconsolidation. (C) 2016. Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据