4.7 Review

A review of vulnerability and risks for schizophrenia: Beyond the two hit hypothesis

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 185-194

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.017

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH
  2. Simons Autism Foundation
  3. Cancer Council of Victoria
  4. CRC for Mental Health
  5. Stanley Medical Research Foundation
  6. MBF
  7. NHMRC
  8. Beyond Blue
  9. Geelong Medical Research Foundation
  10. Bristol Myers Squibb
  11. Eli Lilly
  12. GlaxoSmithKline
  13. Organon
  14. Novartis
  15. Mayne Pharma
  16. Servier
  17. Brain and Behaviour Research Institute
  18. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
  19. Australian Rotary Health
  20. Ian Potter Foundation
  21. Meat and Livestock Board
  22. University of Melbourne
  23. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  24. ARHRF
  25. Simons Foundation
  26. Fondation FondaMental
  27. NIMH [MH099431]
  28. Brain and Behavior Foundation
  29. Marion
  30. EH Flack Trust
  31. Deakin University
  32. Brazillian Society Mobility Program Lilly
  33. ASBD/Servier Grant
  34. John Cade Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council [APP1056929]
  35. NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship [628386]
  36. Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD) Distinguished Investigator Award (US) [18722]
  37. Janssen Cilag
  38. BMS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schizophrenia risk has often been conceptualized using a model which requires two hits in order to generate the clinical phenotype the first as an early priming in a genetically predisposed individual and the second a likely environmental insult. The aim of this paper was to review the literature and reformulate this binary risk-vulnerability model. We sourced the data for this narrative review from the electronic database PUBMED. Our search terms were not limited by language or date of publication. The development of schizophrenia may be driven by genetic vulnerability interacting with multiple vulnerability factors including lowered prenatal vitamin D exposure, viral infections, smoking intelligence quotient, social cognition cannabis use, social defeat, nutrition and childhood trauma. It is likely that these genetic risks, environmental risks and vulnerability factors are cumulative and interactive with each other and with critical periods of neurodevelopmental vulnerability. The development of schizophrenia is likely to be more complex and nuanced than the binary two hit model originally proposed nearly thirty years ago. Risk appears influenced by a more complex process involving genetic risk interfacing with multiple potentially interacting hits and vulnerability factors occurring at key periods of neurodevelopmental activity, which culminate in the expression of disease state. These risks are common across a number of neuropsychiatric and medical disorders, which might inform common preventive and intervention strategies across non-communicable disorders. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据