4.3 Article

Assessing the Genotoxicity of Cellulose Nanomaterials in a Co-Culture of Human Lung Epithelial Cells and Monocyte-Derived Macrophages

期刊

BIOENGINEERING-BASEL
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10080986

关键词

nanofibrillated cellulose; nanocrystalline cellulose; safety assessment; biocompatibility; respiratory effects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellulose micro/nanomaterials (CMNMs) are innovative materials with broad industrial and biomedical applications. This study evaluated the genotoxicity of two types of cellulose micro/nanofibrils (CMF and CNF) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), and found that CNC and CNF did not exhibit genotoxicity under the tested conditions, while CMF displayed a low genotoxic potential.
Cellulose micro/nanomaterials (CMNMs) are innovative materials with a wide spectrum of industrial and biomedical applications. Although cellulose has been recognized as a safe material, the unique properties of its nanosized forms have raised concerns about their safety for human health. Genotoxicity is an endpoint that must be assessed to ensure that no carcinogenic risks are associated with exposure to nanomaterials. In this study, we evaluated the genotoxicity of two types of cellulose micro/nanofibrils (CMF and CNF) and one sample of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), obtained from industrial bleached Eucalyptus globulus kraft pulp. For that, we exposed co-cultures of human alveolar epithelial A549 cells and THP-1 monocyte-derived macrophages to a concentration range of each CMNM and used the micronucleus (MN) and comet assays. Our results showed that only the lowest concentrations of the CMF sample were able to induce DNA strand breaks (FPG-comet assay). However, none of the three CMNMs produced significant chromosomal alterations (MN assay). These findings, together with results from previous in vitro studies using monocultures of A549 cells, indicate that the tested CNF and CNC are not genotoxic under the conditions tested, while the CMF display a low genotoxic potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据