4.4 Article

Evaluation of the Safety and Gastrointestinal Migration of Guanidinylated Chitosan after Oral Administration to Rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jfb14070340

关键词

chitosan; guanidinylation; membrane permeability; water-soluble

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers evaluated the in vivo safety of GCS and observed no deleterious effects after a single oral administration of an excessive dose. They also found that GCS had a slower migration rate in the gastrointestinal tract and exhibited mucoadhesive properties. Future studies will focus on using GCS to improve absorption of poorly water-soluble and poorly membrane-permeable drugs.
Arginine-rich membrane-permeable peptides (APPs) can be delivered to cells by forming complexes with various membrane-impermeable bioactive molecules such as proteins. We recently reported on the preparation of guanidinylated chitosan (GCS) that mimics arginine peptides, using chitosan, a naturally occurring cationic polysaccharide, and confirmed that it enhances protein permeability in an in vitro cell system. However, studies on the in vivo safety of GCS are not available. To address this, we evaluated the in vivo safety of GCS and its translocation into the gastrointestinal tract in rats after a single oral administration of an excessive dose (500 mg/kg) and observed changes in body weight, major organ weights, and organ tissue sections for periods of up to 2 weeks. The results indicated that GCS causes no deleterious effects. The results of an oral administration of rhodamine-labeled chitosan and an evaluation of its migration in the gastrointestinal tract suggested that the disappearance of rhodamine-labeled GCS from the body appeared to be slower than that of the non-dose group and pre-guanidinylated chitosan due to its mucoadhesive properties. In the future, we plan to investigate the use of GCS to improve absorption using Class III and IV drugs, which are poorly water-soluble as well as poorly membrane-permeable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据