4.4 Article

Prognostic value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameters for high-grade glioma patients

期刊

NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 58, 期 12, 页码 1197-1208

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-016-1741-7

关键词

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; Gliomas; Perfusion transfer coefficient; Vascular plasma volume fraction

资金

  1. MRC [MR/M009106/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prognostic value of the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI perfusion and its histogram analysis-derived metrics is not well established for high-grade glioma (HGG) patients. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate DCE perfusion transfer coefficient (K-trans), vascular plasma volume fraction (v(p)), extracellular volume fraction (v(e)), reverse transfer constant (k(ep)), and initial area under gadolinium concentration time curve (IAUGC) as predictors of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in HGG patients. Sixty-nine patients with suspected anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma underwent preoperative DCE-MRI scans. DCE perfusion whole tumor region histogram parameters, clinical details, and PFS and OS data were obtained. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to identify perfusion parameters with the best differentiation performance. On univariate analysis, v(e) and skewness of v(p) had significant negative impacts, while k(ep) had significant positive impact on OS (P < 0.05). v(e) was also a negative predictor of PFS (P < 0.05). Patients with lower v(e) and IAUGC had longer median PFS and OS on Kaplan-Meier analysis (P < 0.05). K-trans and v(e) could also differentiate grade III from IV gliomas (area under the curve 0.819 and 0.791, respectively). High v(e) is a consistent predictor of worse PFS and OS in HGG glioma patients. v(p) skewness and k(ep) are also predictive for OS. K-trans and v(e) demonstrated the best diagnostic performance for differentiating grade III from IV gliomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据