3.8 Article

Community forest legislation in India: Rights-based polycentrism or responsibilization?

期刊

WORLD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES
卷 31, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.wdp.2023.100525

关键词

Rights-based approaches; Responsibilization; Forest rights; Polycentric governance; Civil society organizations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explains the weak performance of forest resource rights recognized under the Forest Rights Act of 2006 in India, citing factors such as support from civil society, technical and bureaucratic hindrances, and conflicting regulatory frameworks. By combining the rights-based approach and polycentrism, the authors argue that the legislation falls short in making the state accountable and fails to empower local communities in forest management decisions. They suggest that addressing these design gaps is crucial for scaling up decentralized forest governance.
In India, forest rights of forest-dependent communities are democratized and decentralized under the Forest Rights Act of 2006 (FRA). This paper attempts to explain the weak performance of the community forest resource rights recognized under this legislation. We begin by discerning the enabling and impeding factors that have influenced the operationalization of the community forest resource rights. We found that support from civil society has been crucial in building collective action and social capital. Technical, financial and bureaucratic hindrances in addition to a conflicting regulatory framework were the major barriers. We conceptualized the framework of rights-based polycentrism by combining the rights-based approach and polycentrism, and using this lens analyzed the design of the community forest resource rights. We found that the legislation falls short of making the state accountable and repositioning the role of the forest department as a duty bearer. The Act assigns responsibilities of biodiversity conservation, protection of catchments, sustainable resource use and preservation from destructive practices to the local communities, without provisioning additional funds or functionaries. Also, the state has not played an enabling role by building agency, capacity and institutions, and continues to be substantially invested in local forest management decisions. We opine that unless these design gaps in the legislation are plugged, it will result in rights-based responsibilization and adversely impact the scaling up of decentralized forest governance. Other developing nations can also benefit from using the rights-based polycentrism lens to strengthen the design of their sustainable forest management policy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据