4.7 Article

Neuropeptide S reduces fear and avoidance of con-specifics induced by social fear conditioning and social defeat, respectively

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 284-291

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.03.054

关键词

Neuropeptide S; Social fear conditioning; Cued fear conditioning; Social defeat; Social avoidance; Anxiety

资金

  1. BMBF
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Ne465/23]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuropeptide S (NPS) has anxiolytic effects and facilitates extinction of cued fear in rodents. Here, we investigated whether NPS reverses social fear and social avoidance induced by social fear conditioning (SFC) and acute social defeat (SD), respectively, in male CD1 mice. Our results revealed that intra-cerebroventricular NPS (icy; 10 and 50 nmol/2 mu l) reversed fear of unknown con-specifics induced by SFC and dose-dependently reduced avoidance of known aggressive con-specifics induced by SD. While 50 nmol of NPS completely reversed social avoidance and reinstated social preference, 10 nmol of NPS reduced social avoidance, but did not completely reinstate social preference in socially-defeated mice. Further, a lower dose (1 nmol/2 mu l) of NPS facilitated the within-session extinction of cued fear, while a higher dose (10 nmol/2 mu l) reduced the expression of cued fear. We could also confirm the anxiolytic effects of NPS (1,10 and 50 nmol/2 mu l) on the elevated plus-maze (EPM), which were not accompanied by alterations in locomotor activity either on the EPM or in the home cage. Finally, we could show that icy infusion of the NPS receptor 1 antagonist D-Cys(Bu-t)(5)-NPS (10 nmol/2 mu l) did not alter SFC-induced social fear, general anxiety and locomotor activity. Taken together, our study extends the potent anxiolytic profile of NPS to a social context by demonstrating the reduction of social fear and social avoidance, thus providing the framework for studies investigating the involvement of the NPS system in the regulation of different types of social behaviour. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据