4.8 Article

Positive Allosteric Modulators of GluN2A-Containing NMDARs with Distinct Modes of Action and Impacts on Circuit Function

期刊

NEURON
卷 89, 期 5, 页码 983-999

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.016

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  2. DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. NIH, National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P41GM103393]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  5. National Research Council Canada
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  7. Province of Saskatchewan
  8. Western Economic Diversification Canada
  9. University of Saskatchewan
  10. U.S. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  11. Pierre-Gilles-de-Gennes Foundation
  12. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM) [Equipe FRM DEQ20130326520]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To enhance physiological function of NMDA receptors (NMDARs), we identified positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of NMDARs with selectivity for GluN2A subunit-containing receptors. X-ray crystallography revealed a binding site at the GluN1-GluN2A dimer interface of the extracellular ligand-binding domains (LBDs). Despite the similarity between the LBDs of NMDARs and AMPA receptors (AMPARs), GluN2A PAMs with good selectivity against AMPARs were identified. Potentiation was observed with recombinant triheteromeric GluN1/GluN2A/GluN2B NMDARs and with synaptically activated NMDARs in brain slices from wildtype (WT), but not GluN2A knockout (KO), mice. Individual GluN2A PAMs exhibited variable degrees of glutamate (Glu) dependence, impact on NMDAR Glu EC50, and slowing of channel deactivation. These distinct PAMs also exhibited differential impacts during synaptic plasticity induction. The identification of a new NMDAR modulatory site and characterization of GluN2A-selective PAMs provide powerful molecular tools to dissect NMDAR function and demonstrate the feasibility of a therapeutically desirable type of NMDAR enhancement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据