4.3 Article

Choline Ameliorates Disease Phenotypes in Human iPSC Models of Rett Syndrome

期刊

NEUROMOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 364-377

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12017-016-8421-y

关键词

Choline; Human iPSC; MeCP2; Rett syndrome; Synaptic functions; ChAT; Lipid metabolite profile; Neutraceutical

资金

  1. Abbott Nutrition
  2. Cognition Center of Excellence, Singapore RD
  3. Academic Center of Excellence (ACE) research award from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
  4. National Research Foundation Singapore under its Competitive Research Program [NRF 2008 NRF-CRP 002-082]
  5. National Research Medical Council (NMRC)-Collaborative Research Programme Grant (CBRG) [NMRC/CBRG/0094/2015]
  6. Ministry of Education (MOE) [MOE2015-T2-1-022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rett syndrome (RTT) is a postnatal neurodevelopmental disorder that primarily affects girls. Mutations in the methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene account for approximately 95 % of all RTT cases. To model RTT in vitro, we generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from fibroblasts of two RTT patients with different mutations (MECP2 R306C and MECP2 1155D32) in their MECP2 gene. We found that these iPSCs were capable of differentiating into functional neurons. Compared to control neurons, the RTT iPSC-derived cells had reduced soma size and a decreased amount of synaptic input, evident both as fewer Synapsin 1-positive puncta and a lower frequency of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents. Supplementation of the culture media with choline rescued all of these defects. Choline supplementation may act through changes in the expression of choline acetyltransferase, an important enzyme in cholinergic signaling, and also through alterations in the lipid metabolite profiles of the RTT neurons. Our study elucidates the possible mechanistic pathways for the effect of choline on human RTT cell models, thereby illustrating the potential for using choline as a nutraceutical to treat RTT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据