3.8 Article

The first experience of using prostate cancer organoids as a model for personalized selection of drugs

期刊

ONKOUROLOGIYA
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 41-46

出版社

ABV-PRESS PUBL HOUSE
DOI: 10.17650/1726-9776-2023-19-2-41-46

关键词

prostate cancer; tumor organoids; personalized therapy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a culture of prostate cancer cells was successfully generated using organoid technology. Results from the cell viability assay showed that docetaxel had no significant impact on the survival of prostate cancer cells. Therefore, while tumor organoids may be a promising approach for personalized treatment selection, further research is needed to validate its use.
Background. A promising experimental approach to the personalized selection of treatment regimens is the study of the sensitivity of tumor cells to drugs in vitro on tumor organoids. Aim. To generate a culture of prostate tumor organoids and to assess the effectiveness of the chemotherapeutic drug docetaxel used to treat prostate cancer on this culture. Materials and methods. The initial tissue was dissociated using gentleMACS Octo homogenizer. Next, the cells were cultured in matrix Matrigel with addition of a serum-free complete nutrient medium. For histological analysis, organoids were fixed in a 10 % formalin solution, followed by staining with hematoxylin and eosin according to the standard protocol. Cell viability was assessed using MTS assay. Results. In this work, we generated a new culture of prostate cancer cells. The histological analysis confirmed that the resulting organoids consist of tumor epithelial cells. As a result of the cytotoxic test, it was shown that in this case docetaxel (82.9 %; p = 0.32) didn't reduce statistically significantly the viability of prostate cancer cells compared to the control. Conclusion. The use of tumor organoids of prostate cancer for selection of an optimal treatment regimen is a promising experimental technology, however, further research is necessary for its introduction into practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据