3.8 Article

Assessment of 12 years (2011-2023) implementation of the 2003 UNESCO convention on safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) in Tanzania

期刊

COGENT ARTS & HUMANITIES
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2254044

关键词

safeguarding; culture; intangible cultural Heritage; convention; UNESCO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the safeguarding and implementation of the ICH convention in Tanzania. It reveals that the country has made little progress in identifying and safeguarding intangible cultural heritage due to a lack of understanding and negative beliefs. The fear of identity problems and tribalism has also hindered the implementation of ICH in the country.
This article examines the safeguarding and implementation of the ICH convention using a case study approach in the United Republic of Tanzania context. The study investigated safeguarding measures employed after independence in 1961 and since 2011 when the country became a signatory to UNESCO (2003) convention. The study revealed that the country has still not achieved much in terms of identifying and safeguarding intangible cultural heritage (ICH). The country has neither developed a national inventory nor inscribed any element on the UNESCO Representative List of Intangible Cultural Heritage. This situation is due to the failure to understand the philosophical background of the ICH Convention. The negative beliefs of some people that many cultural elements such as rituals and witchcraft are outdated or evil has influenced challenges in safeguarding ICH in Tanzania. Furthermore, fear of bringing identity problems and tribalism issues while there is a feeling that Tanzanians are unified by the Kiswahili language which leads to Swahili culture has also brought negative perspectives towards safeguarding and implementing ICH in the country. Finally, this paper contributes to the discourse on the best practices in safeguarding and implementing ICH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据