3.8 Article

The exploration of near-extinct indigenous Ghanaian cultural symbols for interior decoration

期刊

COGENT ARTS & HUMANITIES
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2243715

关键词

indigenous; heritage; cultural symbols; interior decoration; philosophical meaning; >

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces an art piece that integrates near-extinct Ghanaian symbols into an interior decoration for public spaces. The designer adopts an aesthetico research method to aesthetically showcase symbols from four ethnic groups and provides philosophical meanings to educate the public and preserve these symbols.
The culture and artistic heritage of Ghana have been endorsed by the rich influence of Akan symbols like Adinkra, the akuaba doll, and others from various ethnic groups. However, the integration of ethnically unique near-extinct symbols into an art piece to highlight the cultural diversity of Ghana for wall hanging is rare. This work brings to life indigenous Ghanaian symbols on the verge of extinction from four ethnic groups, namely, the Akan, Ewe, Ga-Adangbe, and Mole-Dagbani to design a wall hanging for interior decoration, especially for public spaces by adopting Cora Marshal's aesthetico research to generate a Quali-Aesthetico model. The design aesthetically ingrained conceptual aboriginal art and near-extinct indigenous Ghanaian symbols from the four ethnic groups as inspiration. The creative integration of these symbols yielded an interesting art piece that provides a unique ambiance for a simulated interior-decorated airport and an art gallery suitably displayed on flat interior surfaces. Besides the artistic expression of the art piece, interpretations of the uniquely combined symbols and their philosophical meanings have been provided to educate the public about the rich Ghanaian cultural heritage. The art piece also seeks to preserve near-extinct identity symbols and create a sense of belonging for the younger generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据