3.8 Article

Revisiting Kenya's defunct Building Bridges Initiative: Quest for justice, or manipulation of collective memory for political expediency?

期刊

COGENT ARTS & HUMANITIES
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2264025

关键词

Building Bridges Initiative; Kenyatta; Odinga; Ruto; Collective memory; Transitional Justice; Post-election violence; Rectificatory justice; Kenya; Power

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Kenyan political reconciliation initiative, known as the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI), needs critical reassessment as it may have been motivated by succession politics. Grassroots perception of justice for victims of post-election violence differs from the BBI report, and Kenyans vividly remember the 2017 election cycle and its atrocities.
Contemporary scholarship overwhelmingly suggests that political elites cannot be trusted to initiate and lead reconciliation processes, for various reasons such as the manipulation of collective memory for political expediency. Accordingly, this paper posits, Kenya's now-defunct Building Bridges Initiative (BBI), the product of a 2018 political truce (handshake) between arch-rivals-former President Uhuru Kenyatta and opposition leader Raila Odinga-ought to be critically reassessed. Although it was presented to Kenyans as an instrument for building lasting unity, giving the impression that it would yield justice for, among others, victims of electoral violence, it may also have been motivated by succession politics. This study, therefore, employs a qualitative design anchored in focus group methodology to seek answers to the following two broad questions: 1) Did Kenyans at the grassroots consider the handshake and the resultant BBI appropriate justice mechanisms vis-a-vis the post-election violence of 2017? 2) How did the handshake and BBI affect collective memory of the 2017 post-election violence? It finds, partly, that the grassroots understanding of what constitutes justice for victims of post-election violence in Kenya largely differs from and even transcends the content of the BBI report; it is multifaceted and features, amongst other aspects, the need to first acknowledge the victims of Kenya's post-election violence and a grassroots-oriented approach to conciliation, involving apologies and forgiveness deriving from face-to-face engagements between citizens and the police. Also, Kenyans remember the 2017 election cycle, and the atrocities thereof, vividly. The findings suggest that future conciliatory measures in the Kenyan scenario would have greater impact if they combined elements of transitional and rectificatory justice to ensure the restoration of the dignity of victims of atrocities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据