3.8 Article

Vermeintlich unvermeidlich: Poetik und Psychologie der Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

期刊

出版社

BRILL
DOI: 10.30965/25890530-05412006

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces the concept of the "self-fulfilling prophecy" to literary studies and explores its different narrative structures and historical variations. It focuses on the modernist variant found in the works of Oscar Wilde, Thomas Mann, and Arthur Schnitzler, highlighting the difficulty of distinguishing causality attribution and narrative representation. The article also discusses the role of ambiguity and perspectivism in cause-and-effect narratives and reflects on the potential dialogue between social psychology and literary studies.
The `self-fulfilling prophecy' has become an influential concept in contemporary behavioral psychology and economics. It has not yet been systematically introduced to literary studies, however, even though prophecies count among the long-lasting motifs of Western literature. This article aims to differentiate the psychological model of the `self-fulfilling prophecy' by first defining its basic narrative structure and identifying various formal realizations of the structure. A second section argues that these variants are historically dependent -they emerge and evolve with time. I will devote special attention to a typically modernist variant, which surfaces around 1900 in short stories by Oscar Wilde, Thomas Mann, and Arthur Schnitzler. These stories evince the general difficulty of distinguishing between the attribution of causality and its modes of narrative representation. As a third section suggests, a poetics of self-fulfilling proph- ecies might help to appreciate the role that ambiguity and perspectivism play in any cause-and-effect-narratives, may they be fictional or factual. In light of this, the article reflects more generally on the possibilities and challenges of a dialogue between social psychology and literary studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据