4.4 Review

The Insertion and Management of External Ventricular Drains: An Evidence-Based Consensus Statement

期刊

NEUROCRITICAL CARE
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 61-81

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-015-0224-8

关键词

EVD; External ventricular drain; Ventriculostomy; Ventriculostomy-related infection; Ventriculostomy associated infection; VAI; VRI; Hydrocephalus; ICP; Monitoring; CSF drainage; Hemorrhage; Antibiotics; Antibiotic coated catheter; Antimicrobial coated catheter; Antibiotic prophylaxis; DVT; Deep venous thrombosis; DVT prophylaxis; Thromboembolism; Intraventricular antibiotics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

External ventricular drains (EVDs) are commonly placed to monitor intracranial pressure and manage acute hydrocephalus in patients with a variety of intracranial pathologies. The indications for EVD insertion and their efficacy in the management of these various conditions have been previously addressed in guidelines published by the Brain Trauma Foundation, American Heart Association and combined committees of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. While it is well recognized that placement of an EVD may be a lifesaving intervention, the benefits can be offset by procedural and catheter-related complications, such as hemorrhage along the catheter tract, catheter malposition, and CSF infection. Despite their widespread use, there are a lack of highquality data regarding the best methods for placement and management of EVDs to minimize these risks. Existing recommendations are frequently based on observational data from a single center and may be biased to the authors' view. To address the need for a comprehensive set of evidence-based guidelines for EVD management, the Neurocritical Care Society organized a committee of experts in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuroinfectious disease, critical care, pharmacotherapy, and nursing. The Committee generated clinical questions relevant to EVD placement and management. They developed recommendations based on a thorough literature review using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, with emphasis placed not only on the quality of the evidence, but also on the balance of benefits versus risks, patient values and preferences, and resource considerations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据