4.2 Article

Heat Treatment of Chert in the Early Mesolithic at Rottenburg-Siebenlinden (Southwest Germany)

期刊

LITHIC TECHNOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01977261.2023.2244779

关键词

Mesolithic; heat treatment; chaine operatoire; Tempern; Muschelkalkhornstein; Beuronian; >

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unambiguous evidence for heat treatment in the Early Mesolithic of Southwestern Germany is restricted to one type of raw material and to cave sites of the Swabian Jura region. At the open-air site Rottenburg-Siebenlinden, heat treatment of an additional raw material was proposed. This paper reexamines the lithic assemblage of horizon III and investigates the timing of heat treatment within the reduction sequence using gloss contrast as the criterion. The results show that heat treatment was regularly applied to a wider range of raw materials during blank production, suggesting a more widespread phenomenon than previously thought.
Unambiguous evidence for heat treatment in the Early Mesolithic of Southwestern Germany is thus far restricted to one type of raw material and to cave sites of the Swabian Jura region. At the open-air site Rottenburg-Siebenlinden, heat treatment of an additional raw material was proposed. In this paper, we reexamine the lithic assemblage of horizon III, using the best available criterion for recognizing heat treatment: gloss contrast. Through technological analysis of these diagnostic artefacts, we investigate the timing of heat treatment within the reduction sequence. Visual identifications were substantiated by analyzing surface roughness of gloss contrast artefacts. Our results show that heat treatment was regularly applied to a wider range of raw materials than previously thought, during blank production. These findings highlight that the last Central European hunter-gatherers were flexible in terms of material choices and that heat treatment was a more widespread phenomenon than previously thought.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据