3.8 Article

Interactions and Dynamics of One-Dimensional Droplets, Bubbles and Kinks

期刊

CONDENSED MATTER
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/condmat8030067

关键词

Bose-Einstein condensates; Lee-Huang-Yang corrections; quantum droplets; quantum fluctuations; nonlinear excitations; solitons; Manton's method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the dynamics and interactions of multiple bright droplets and bubbles, as well as the interactions of kinks with droplets and antikinks. The study reveals the in-phase and out-of-phase attraction/repulsion behavior between droplets, as well as the mixed behavior for intermediate values of the phase shift. Moreover, phenomena such as mass exchange, core expansion and mutual attraction are observed.
We explore the dynamics and interactions of multiple bright droplets and bubbles, as well as the interactions of kinks with droplets and with antikinks, in the extended one-dimensional Gross-Pitaevskii model including the Lee-Huang-Yang correction. Existence regions are identified for the one-dimensional droplets and bubbles in terms of their chemical potential, verifying the stability of the droplets and exposing the instability of the bubbles. The limiting case of the droplet family is a stable kink. The interactions between droplets demonstrate in-phase (out-of-phase) attraction (repulsion), with the so-called Manton's method explicating the observed dynamical response, and mixed behavior for intermediate values of the phase shift. Droplets bearing different chemical potentials experience mass-exchange phenomena. Individual bubbles exhibit core expansion and mutual attraction prior to their destabilization. Droplets interacting with kinks are absorbed by them, a process accompanied by the emission of dispersive shock waves and gray solitons. Kink-antikink interactions are repulsive, generating counter-propagating shock waves. Our findings reveal dynamical features of droplets and kinks that can be detected in current experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据