3.8 Article

Maroon Women in Suriname and French Guiana: Rice, Slavery, Memory

期刊

SLAVERY & ABOLITION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0144039X.2023.2228771

关键词

Maroons; rice; oral history; female agency

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the scarcity of written documents, this article explores the role of oral history, ethnobotany, and linguistics in analyzing the African agency in transferring crops and knowledge within Maroon communities. The focus is on the names of specific rice varieties, which pay tribute to the enslaved women and their crucial role in ensuring food security for runaway communities. The study combines ethnobotanical surveys, Maroon oral history, archival documents, and published accounts to illustrate how Maroon farmers today preserve their agricultural diversity and cultural heritage by planting rice varieties named after their female ancestors.
Given the few written documents left behind by those who escaped slavery, the analysis of African agency in the transfer of crops and knowledge in the successful establishment of Maroon communities benefits from other disciplines, such as oral history, ethnobotany and linguistics. In this article, we report the way stories of enslaved women, who escaped in the early periods of slave rebellion in Suriname, live on in the names of specific rice varieties. Such stories pay tribute to the crucial role women played in ensuring food security for their runaway communities. We combined information from ethnobotanical surveys, Maroon oral history, archival documents and published accounts to show how Maroon farmers today safeguard their agricultural diversity and cultural heritage by planting rice varieties that still carry the names of their female ancestors. We focus on a selected number of rice varieties named after the Saamaka ancestors Seei, Yaya and Paanza, Tjowa of the Matawai, Sapali, Ana and Baapa of the Ndyuka, and describe the stories attached to them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据