4.7 Article

PPARγ-induced upregulation of CD36 enhances hematoma resolution and attenuates long-term neurological deficits after germinal matrix hemorrhage in neonatal rats

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
卷 87, 期 -, 页码 124-133

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2015.12.015

关键词

PPAR gamma; CD36; Germinal matrix hemorrhage; Post-hemorrhagic ventricular dilation; Hematoma resolution

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [P01 NS082184, R01 NS078755] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Germing matrix hemorrhage remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants in the United States with little progress made in its clinical management. Survivors are often afflicted with long-term neurological sequelae, including cerebral palsy, mental retardation, hydrocephalus, and psychiatric disorders. Blood clots disrupting normal cerebrospinal fluid circulation and absorption after germinal matrix hemorrhage are thought to be important contributors towards post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus development We evaluated if upregulating CD36 scavenger receptor expression in microglia and macrophages through PPAR gamma stimulation, which was effective in experimental adult cerebral hemorrhage models and is being evaluated clinically, will enhance hematoma resolution and ameliorate long-term brain sequelae using a neonatal rat germinal matrix hemorrhage model. PPAR gamma stimulation (15d-PGJ(2)) increased short-term PPAR gamma and CD36 expression levels as well as enhanced hematoma resolution, which was reversed by a PPAR gamma antagonist (GW9662) and CD36 siRNA. PPAR gamma stimulation (15d-PGJ(2)) also reduced long-term white matter loss and post-hemorrhagic ventricular dilation as well as improved neurofunctional outcomes, which were reversed by a PPAR-gamma antagonist (GW9662). PPAR gamma-induced upregulation of CD36 in macrophages and microglia is, therefore, critical for enhancing hematoma resolution and ameliorating long-term brain sequelae. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据