4.5 Article

Obesity associated with increased brain age from midlife

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 63-70

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.07.010

关键词

Obesity; White-matter volume; Structural MRI; Population-based

资金

  1. Bernard Wolfe Health Neuroscience Fund
  2. Wellcome Trust [RNAG/259]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H008217/1]
  4. BBSRC [BB/H008217/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [MC_U105597119, MC_U105579215] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H008217/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_U105597119, MC_U105579215, MC_UU_12012/5/B] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10084] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Wellcome Trust [103838/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Common mechanisms in aging and obesity are hypothesized to increase susceptibility to neuro-degeneration, however, direct evidence in support of this hypothesis is lacking. We therefore performed a cross-sectional analysis of magnetic resonance image-based brain structure on a population-based cohort of healthy adults. Study participants were originally part of the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) and included 527 individuals aged 20-87 years. Cortical reconstruction techniques were used to generate measures of whole-brain cerebral white-matter volume, cortical thickness, and surface area. Results indicated that cerebral white-matter volume in overweight and obese individuals was associated with a greater degree of atrophy, with maximal effects in middle-age corresponding to an estimated increase of brain age of 10 years. There were no similar body mass index-related changes in cortical parameters. This study suggests that at a population level, obesity may increase the risk of neurodegeneration. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据