4.5 Article

Comparative blood transcriptome analysis in idiopathic and LRRK2 G2019S-associated Parkinson's disease

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.10.026

关键词

Parkinson's disease; LRRK2; Gene expression; RNA-seq; Trancriptome; Peripheral blood

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI11/00228]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) carrying the G2019S mutation of the LRRK2 gene provide an opportunity of studying in a homogeneous setting the molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of common idiopathic forms of PD. However, whether common mechanisms are involved in both conditions in not known. Here, we compared genome-wide gene expression (RNA sequencing) in peripheral blood between PD patients carrying the G2019S mutation of the LRRK2 gene and idiopathic PD cases, to deepen in the understanding of this topic. In addition, we compared the blood transcriptome between 2 cohorts of carriers of the G2019S mutation (symptomatic and asymptomatic) and 2 cohorts of noncarriers (symptomatic and asymptomatic) for detecting transcriptomic changes attributable to the presence of the G2019S mutation. We searched for gene enrichment in Reactome or Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways. We found that despite some overlap, peripheral blood transcriptome differs widely between idiopathic and LRRK2 G2019S-associated PD, with only 4 deregulated pathways shared by both conditions (complement and coagulation cascades, cell adhesion molecules, hematopoietic cell lineage, and extracellular matrix organization). Changes in the blood transcriptome observed in asymptomatic carriers of the mutation included 6 genes known to be associated with PD in genome-wide association studies and also pathways related with immunity. Our findings emphasize the notion that PD is likely a pathogenically heterogeneous condition and suggest the existence of specific mechanisms involved in LRRK2-associated PD. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据