4.5 Article

Neuromelanin marks the spot: identifying a locus coeruleus biomarker of cognitive reserve in healthy aging

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 117-126

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.09.019

关键词

Locus coeruleus; Aging; Norepinephrine; Cognitive reserve; Brain reserve; Sex; Gender

资金

  1. federal National Institutes of Health [R01AG038043, K02AG032309]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG025340, K02AG032309, R01AG038043] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leading a mentally stimulating life may build up a reserve of neural and mental resources that preserve cognitive abilities in late life. Recent autopsy evidence links neuronal density in the locus coeruleus (LC), the brain's main source of norepinephrine, to slower cognitive decline before death, inspiring the idea that the noradrenergic system is a key component of reserve (Robertson, I. H. 2013. A noradrenergic theory of cognitive reserve: implications for Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 34, 298-308). Here, we tested this hypothesis using neuromelanin-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging to visualize and measure LC signal intensity in healthy younger and older adults. Established proxies of reserve, including education, occupational attainment, and verbal intelligence, were linearly correlated with LC signal intensity in both age groups. Results indicated that LC signal intensity was significantly higher in older than younger adults and significantly lower in women than in men. Consistent with the LC-reserve hypothesis, both verbal intelligence and a composite reserve score were positively associated with LC signal intensity in older adults. LC signal intensity was also more strongly associated with attentional shifting ability in older adults with lower cognitive reserve. Together these findings link in vivo estimates of LC neuromelanin signal intensity to cognitive reserve in normal aging. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据