4.3 Editorial Material

Anti-racist organising today: a roundtable discussion

期刊

RACE & CLASS
卷 65, 期 1, 页码 119-133

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/03063968231168013

关键词

A. Sivanandan; abolition; Abolition Revolution; anti-racism; Anti-racist Scholar-Activism; Black Power; Black Radical Tradition; communities of resistance; IRR50; policing; Race to the Bottom; reclaiming anti-racism; Sisters Uncut

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article compiles contributions from participants of a roundtable discussion on 'Anti-racist organising today' that took place after the 'New Circuits of Anti-racism Conference' in King's College London in October 2022 (IRR50). Five influential anti-racist writers and activists (Azfar Shafi and Ilyas Nagdee, co-authors of Race to the Bottom: reclaiming anti-racism (Pluto Press, 2022), Shanice Octavia McBean, co-author with Aviah Sarah Day of Abolition Revolution (Pluto Press, 2022), and Remi Joseph-Salisbury and Laura Connelly, co-authors of Anti-racist Scholar-Activism (Manchester University Press, 2021)) came together to discuss the main themes of their books, the impact of A. Sivanandan on their activism, and the key issues facing anti-racist organizers today.
This article brings together contributions from participants in a roundtable discussion on 'Anti-racist organising today' which concluded the 'New Circuits of Anti-racism Conference', King's College London, October 2022 (IRR50). Five key anti-racist writers and activists - Azfar Shafi and Ilyas Nagdee, co-authors of Race to the Bottom: reclaiming anti-racism (Pluto Press, 2022), Shanice Octavia McBean, co-author with Aviah Sarah Day of Abolition Revolution (Pluto Press, 2022), and Remi Joseph-Salisbury and Laura Connelly, co-authors of Anti-racist Scholar-Activism (Manchester University Press, 2021) - came together to discuss the key themes of their books, the influence of A. Sivanandan on their activism, as well as the main issues for anti-racist organisers today.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据