4.3 Article

Medicaid Expansion and the Mental Health of Spousal Caregivers

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11150-023-09673-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Health insurance expansions, specifically the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion, have been found to reduce depressive symptoms among spousal caregivers, leading to a decrease in feelings of depression and an increase in feelings of happiness. This study utilized longitudinal evidence from the Health and Retirement Study and applied event study and Difference-in-Differences design to examine the policy impact of ACA Medicaid on the mental wellbeing of low-income individuals aged 64 or below. The findings suggest that ACA's Medicaid has a significant positive effect on the mental wellbeing of informal caregivers.
Health insurance expansions can exert wellbeing effects on individuals who provide informal care to their loved ones, reducing their experience of depression. This study exploits evidence from the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion (ACA Medicaid) to examine the effects on the mental wellbeing of informal caregivers. Drawing on an event study and a Difference-in-Differences (DID) design we investigate the policy impact of ACA Medicaid using longitudinal evidence (from the Health and Retirement Study, HRS) for low-income individuals aged 64 or below. We find that ACA's Medicaid reduced depressive symptoms among spousal caregivers, and specifically we estimate that exposure to ACA Medicaid gives rise to 8.2% points (on average, equivalent to 30% decrease) reduction in the feeling of depression and 8.7% points increase in the feeling of happiness (on average, 11% increase). The estimates are robust to various specifications, and we identify several potential driving mechanisms for the findings: reductions in out of -pocket expenses and labor supply and, as expected, increased after Medicaid uptake. The evidence from falsification tests confirms that the estimated effects are likely due to ACA's Medicaid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据