4.1 Article

Fear and posting in Nepal: countering spectacles of fear through everyday social media practices

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10304312.2023.2267799

关键词

fear; social media; Instagram; small acts of engagement; cultural politics; Nepal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines the cultural politics of fear in post-war Nepal through the study of Nepal banda, a recurring political spectacle. It demonstrates how people employ online tactics to counteract the fear embodied in the Nepal banda, primarily through injecting everyday creativity and leisure into the spectacle. The findings suggest that in a society like Nepal, online engagement often serves as a more viable avenue for political dissent than offline resistance.
This article sheds light upon the cultural politics of fear in post-war Nepal by narrowing in on the Nepal banda - a recurring political spectacle in which the organizers seek to shut down Nepalese society through violent means - tracing both how it shapes and is appropriated in (offline and online) everyday life. In doing so I demonstrate how the online tactics that people employ to navigate the Nepal banda may be understood as countering its spectacle of fear. This happens primarily through the injection of everyday creativity, enjoyment, and leisure into the spectacle of fear embodied in the Nepal banda via the Instagram hashtag #Nepalbanda. As such, the findings indicate that in a society like Nepal where political violence has remained widespread in the post-war period, online engagement often appears as a more viable avenue to practice political dissent than offline resistance. The study furthermore demonstrates the benefits of exploring everyday tactics which are not explicitly political in their intent as countering spectacles of fear. An additional benefit of focusing on such subtle practices is that it does not run the risk of re-iterating the trauma of the original spectacle; an ethical issue raised by previous studies on the matter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据