4.2 Article

Police negotiators and suicide crisis situations: a mixed-methods examination of incident details, characteristics of individuals and precipitating factors

期刊

PSYCHIATRY PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2206878

关键词

alcohol and other drugs; crisis situation; mental health; mixed-methods research; police-mental health collaboration; police negotiation; suicide prevention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Police negotiators in Queensland, Australia play a vital role in handling critical incidents involving individuals at risk of suicide. This study provides an analysis of suicide-related negotiation incidents in Queensland between 2012 and 2014, focusing on the individuals involved and the factors contributing to these incidents. The findings emphasize the need for strong collaboration between law enforcement, healthcare, and social services to develop comprehensive, cross-agency programs.
Police negotiators provide leadership and expertise in the de-escalation and resolution of critical incidents, including responding to individuals exhibiting suicidal behaviour. This study describes the frequency and characteristics of suicide-related negotiation incidents in Queensland, Australia as classified in the Queensland Police Service Negotiator Deployment Database, between 2012 and 2014. Incidents were analysed to understand the individuals involved and precipitating factors including mental health problems and intoxication with alcohol or drugs. Police negotiators were deployed to 156 suicide intervention incidents over a 3-year period, half of which occurred at a residence. The cohort had a median age of 32 years and were predominantly male (82%). Four out of five individuals appeared to have a mental health problem, and at least half were intoxicated due to drugs or alcohol. Findings highlight the importance of strong linkages between police, health and social services and the need for innovative and comprehensive, cross-agency programmes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据