4.2 Article

Religion and cognitive control: An event-coding approach

期刊

NEW IDEAS IN PSYCHOLOGY
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101022

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Religion plays a significant role in people's lives, either as a member of a specific religious group or as an agnostic living among believers. It has impacts on decision-making and action, with implications that religious goals can influence behavior, and religion can enhance cognitive control. However, the mechanisms underlying these impacts remain unknown. A preliminary mechanistic model based on the Theory of Event Coding (TEC) suggests that distributed representation of goals and metacontrol can moderate their impact. This model provides a basis for further experimentation and theorizing.
Religion is playing an important role in our lives, be it from a personal perspective as member of a particular congregation or as an agnostic living among believers. What impact has religion on our decision-making and action? Two kinds of impact have been considered: religious goals are likely to constrain and color our behavior, but religion may also strengthen cognitive control in a more generic sense. While evidence supports both considerations, it remains a mystery how that works, that is, which mechanisms underlie the impact of religion on our decisions and action control. Here I suggest a preliminary mechanistic model accounting for this impact. It is based on the Theory of Event Coding (TEC), a general theory of human perception, attention, and action control, and the assumptions that goals are represented in a distributed fashion (as selection criteria) and that their impact is moderated by metacontrol, the current control style that varies between persistence and flexibility. The model is parsimonious (i.e., not religion-specific) and mechanistically transparent, and thus provides a solid basis for more systematic experi-mentation and theorizing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据