4.3 Article

Is China Socialist? Theorising the Political Economy of China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ASIA
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00472336.2023.2235757

关键词

Capitalism; Chinese political economy; Marx; socialism; state; >

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article explores important and interconnected issues related to China's current social formation and its relationship with socialism. By examining key principles of socialism, the article concludes that China does not meet the criteria for being a socialist country. It further evaluates the possibility of China returning to socialism based on the ruling party's motivations and the power dynamics of various social forces, as well as analyzes the role of the state in controlling economic resources and its impact on society and the economy.
This article investigates important and interrelated issues regarding China. It seeks to understand China's current social formation, setting out the relationship between China and socialism. To examine whether China is socialist, this article examines key principles of socialism drawn from Marx including: individuals' possession of the means of subsistence; the entitlement to a share of the means of production that are held in common; equality; and the degree to which the state is withering. Through an examination of China's social welfare regime, the rural land ownership regime, and state-owned enterprise profit sharing with citizens, the article finds that China does not meet the criteria for socialism. In this context, the article continues to evaluate - based on an examination of the ruling party's motivations and the power dynamics of several social forces - the possibility that China could return to socialism once it builds a sustaining productive dynamic. Also investigated is the role of the state, analysing state-controlled economic resources including natural objects and state-owned enterprise and their impacts on society and the economy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据